To prepare:

• Review the Aravind case study in the Learning Resources.
• With the 5 I’s of marketing in mind, reflect on the health care service provided by the organization and its personnel.

The Assignment

In a 4 page paper, address the following:

• Using the 5 I’s of marketing, analyze the health care service provided by the organization in the scenario.
  • Inconsistency: Is there consistency in the quality of care?
  • Inseparability: When providing the service, do providers demonstrate biases toward or against patients and their families (i.e., racial biases, age biases, gender biases, etc.)?
  • Intangibility: What are the intangible characteristics of providers (i.e., demeanor, posture, etc.)? How do providers behave toward patients?
  • Interaction with consumers: Is the organization patient-centered or physician-centered?
  • Inventory: How much time is spent on providing the service and how much time is spent on non-service-related activities?
• Recommend strategies to market this service to health care consumers. Include how these strategies might improve operations.

Hello! Ive attached a document, are you able to access it? and here is the rubric

EXCELLENT – above expectationsGOOD – met expectationsFAIR – below expectationsPOOR – significantly below expectations or missingAnalysis of health care services using the 5 I-s of marketing

36 (36%) – 40 (40%)

The analysis of health care services using the 5 I-s of marketing shows depth, breadth, triangulation, and clarity in critical thinking.

32 (32%) – 35 (35%)

The analysis using the 5 I-s of marketing fully addresses the services of the health care organization.
Triangulation was attempted but not fully shown.

28 (28%) – 31 (31%)

The analysis of health care services using the 5 I-s of marketing lacks depth, breadth, triangulation, and clarity in critical thinking.

0 (0%) – 27 (27%)

The analysis using the 5 I-s of marketing does not address (zero points) or poorly addresses the services of the health care organization.

Recommendations of strategies to market services

36 (36%) – 40 (40%)

The recommendations show depth, breadth, triangulation, and clarity in critical thinking.

32 (32%) – 35 (35%)

The recommendations fully address how to market the health care services.
Triangulation was attempted but not fully shown.

28 (28%) – 31 (31%)

The recommendations lack depth, breadth, triangulation, and clarity in critical thinking.

0 (0%) – 27 (27%)

The recommendations do not address (zero points) or poorly addresses how to market the health care services.

Writing

18 (18%) – 20 (20%)

The analysis is well organized, uses professional tone, contains original writing and proper paraphrasing, contains very few or no writing and/or spelling errors, and is fully consistent with graduate-level writing style.
The work is supported by at least five high-quality references including three from peer-reviewed journals.

16 (16%) – 17 (17%)

The analysis is mostly consistent with graduate-level writing style and may have some spelling and writing errors.
The work is supported by at least five high-quality references including three from peer-reviewed journals.

14 (14%) – 15 (15%)

The analysis is somewhat consistent with graduate-level writing style and may have some spelling and writing errors.
The work is supported by at least five high-quality references but not from peer-reviewed journals.

0 (0%) – 13 (13%)

The analysis is well below graduate-level writing style expectations for organization, professional tone and writing, or shows heavy reliance on quoting.
The work is not supported by at least five high-quality references including three from peer-reviewed journals.