Juror Decision-Making: Jurors are motivated to make a decision based on what they think is right, not necessarily one that reflects what the judge says. This issue is potentially relevant when the judge tells the jury to disregard inadmissible evidence. In the article cited below, Wegener et al. present the “Flexible Correction Model” in general and apply it to juror decision-making.
*What is the “take-home message” from this article regarding the way in which jurors may be affected by judges’ instructions? Can you think of another courtroom/trial issue to which their model might apply?
Wegener, D. T., Kerr, N. L., Fleming, M. A., & Petty, R. E. (2000). Flexible corrections of juror judgments: Implications for jury instructions. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 6, 629-654. (note: a link to a pdf version of the article is available in “Assignment Choices” and full text is also available through our library)
Delivering a high-quality product at a reasonable price is not enough anymore.
That’s why we have developed 5 beneficial guarantees that will make your experience with our service enjoyable, easy, and safe.
You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.
Read moreEach paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.
Read moreThanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.
Read moreYour email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.
Read moreBy sending us your money, you buy the service we provide. Check out our terms and conditions if you prefer business talks to be laid out in official language.
Read more