DUE 11/9/2018 8 P.M EST
ORIGINAL WORK DATA ATTACHED
Whether in a scholarly or practitioner setting, good research and data analysis should have the benefit of peer feedback. For this Discussion, you will post your response to the hypothesis test, along with the results. (ADD CHARTS)
To prepare for this Discussion:
Use SPSS to answer the research question. Post your response to the following:
EXAMPLE BELOW
For the data set, General Survey, I chose the following variables: Citizen – ARE YOU A CITIZEN OF AMERICA? This is a numeric, nominal, categorical variable ). The second variable: owngun: HAVE GUN IN HOMES2SUSECLG. This is a numeric, nominal, categorical variable ).
Research question: Does American citizenship depict gun ownership in the home?
Null hypothesis for question: American citizenship does not depict gun ownership in the home.
Research design alignment with question: Chi-Square
Dependent variable: Citizen: ARE YOU A CITIZEN OF AMERICA?. This is a numeric, nominal, categorical variable .
Independent variable: Owngun: HAVE GUN IN HOMES2SUSECLG. This is a numeric, nominal, categorical variable (
If you found significance, what is the strength of the effect? The chi-square test will tell us if there is a relationship, not the strength. The Cramer V will assist with the answering the strength of a relationship between the variables. But first, we look at the case processing summary. 871 chose to answer and 1667 are missing from the analysis due to not being available. As we look to the crosstabulation. 99.2% of citizens have a gun in the home and 92% do not. 0.8 non-citizens have a gun in the home and 8.0% have no gun in the home. As we move on to the chi-square test, we can see have significance and therefore reject the null hypothesis that being an American citizen does not indicate gun ownership. Furthermore, our chi-square is 19.255. The test is significant at the .01 level which is well below the .05 threshold. We assume there is a relationship between American citizenship and gun ownership in the home. Now we look to the strength of this relationship. We look to the Cramer’s V, which is .149. A value of 0 indicates no relationship and a value of 1.0 indicated a perfect relationship (Laureate Education, 2016m). We can see there is a relationship but it is a weak relationship.
Table 1
Bivariate and Chi Square Statistics
Explain your results for a lay audience and further explain what the answer is to your research question.
Being an American citizenship does depict gun ownership in a home for those that completed the survey. However, it is a weak relationship due to the number of respondents and the number of missing values.
Delivering a high-quality product at a reasonable price is not enough anymore.
That’s why we have developed 5 beneficial guarantees that will make your experience with our service enjoyable, easy, and safe.
You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.
Read moreEach paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.
Read moreThanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.
Read moreYour email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.
Read moreBy sending us your money, you buy the service we provide. Check out our terms and conditions if you prefer business talks to be laid out in official language.
Read more